'It is this vile battle weapon known as “miracle fishing”, the terror of which keeps us confined to our homes and concentrated in cities.'

HÉCTOR ABAD 

 

 

 

 'Humanitarian exchange can only come about if the guerrillas accept that never again will they resort to kidnapping anyone as part of the fight for their cause.'

HÉCTOR ABAD

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 

Comment on this article             >>
 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Colombians weary of kidnap terror

Kidnap victims in Colombia have risen to a world record of over 17,000 in the last five years. The much tried patience of the Colombian people is now running out, says Héctor Abad Faciolince

US CRIMINAL proceedings against Colombian Farc leader “Mono Jojoy” and other guerrillas have in the past related solely to drug trafficking but now also include an accusation hitherto unheard of in our international relations, namely, kidnapping. It was high time, since the evil crimes catalogue lists it as far more abominable to kidnap people than to export cocaine. So it is not only a question of drugs, but also one of terror.

Terrorism acquires quite distinct forms according to the country in which it operates, and in Colombia it has assumed the specific form of kidnapping. If anything characterises the Colombian case, then it is this vile battle weapon known as “miracle fishing”,  the terror of which keeps us confined to our homes and concentrated in cities. Colombia has increasingly become a kidnapped country and the bloodiest and most brutal counterinsurgent groups that have arisen in Colombia also began with kidnappings: the MAS (“death to kidnappers”) and the AUC (the paramilitary “United Self-Defence Forces”).

This is the only country in the world where there is a radio station entirely dedicated to sending messages to kidnap victims – The Kidnapping Voice, directed by “war reporter” Herbin Hoyos – which reflects the extent of the problem. It is a heart-rending experience to hear over and over again the anguish in the voice of relatives as they try to keep up the spirits of their nearest and dearest pending ransom payments.

And this is the only country in the world where the President of the Republic’s father was murdered in the course of a kidnapping; where the current Vice-President was kidnapped; where the Home Affairs minister’s father was kidnapped; where the Education minister’s mother was kidnapped, tortured and murdered; and where the Culture minister’s aunt was kidnapped and murdered.

It is obvious that this government is marked and defined by the traumatic experience of many of its members. To this may be added every week symptoms of what we might call the government’s “authoritarian temptation”, to a great extent the fruit of personal resentment which has become collective. Lamentable and illegal though it may be, it is fairly natural and very human to react to an adversary’s brutal, ruthless act with a radical, pitiless one.

One may similarly explain the support that the government receives from millions of Colombian citizens, since over 17,000 kidnappings in the past five years alone have produced a mass of indignant people which is increasing exponentially each day. I believe that anger is a poor counsellor in government affairs, but it is what has prevailed through the fault of the kidnappers.

This is the only country in the world where current kidnap victims include the state governor of Antioquia; the former Defence minister, the most charismatic and least rightist in the entire history of the Colombian Defence ministry, Gilberto Echeverri; the former presidential candidate who was most favoured in Europe, Ingrid Betancur; the former Development minister, Fernandín Araújo; twelve deputies, various ex-senators, 42 officials and sub-officials who live in inhuman concentration camps in the midst of forests.

Colombia is now also the only country in the world with a kidnapped Catholic archbishop who is also president of the Latin American Bishops’ Conference [freed by the Colombian army as the article was going to press – Ed]. The guerrilla strategy is to raise the price and increase even more the prestige of its human shields. But such conditions of blackmail, instead of leading us to an exchange of illustrious kidnappings for captured kidnappers, are leading to the total international discredit of the guerrilla.

What these increasingly illustrious kidnappings have done is to remind us that in the last five years there have been more than 17,000 anonymous, uncontrollable and unrecognised kidnappings. They remind us that in 2002 there were 2,253 new kidnappings (60 per cent by armed groups and 35 per cent by common delinquents, according to the Fundación País Libre).

The list includes unarmed civilians, irreproachable doctors and professionals like Javier Correa and journalists with no blame whatsoever. Ordinary citizens will no longer accept the exchange of twenty or thirty illustrious people to the exclusion of thousands of anonymous honest citizens who suffer the same grief and the same ignominy.

Colombian armed groups (guerrillas, self-defence forces and delinquents) have dedicated themselves to an abominable criminal practice in order to finance their operations, and after years of application this weapon is turning against them. Transforming kidnapping into a daily general practice, a suicidal political strategy, is producing a furious and bitter reaction. This atrocious practice that has been employed as a battle instrument is the primary cause of the reaction which the whole country will suffer in the form of a merciless war.

Seventy years ago, in the winter of 1932, the entire world was moved by the kidnapping and later murder of the son of the American aviator hero, Charles Lindbergh. Perhaps none of the 2,253 Colombians kidnapped at present (let us not forget that they include 302 minors) move anyone apart from their families. But the magnitude of this crime has exceeded all limits and the guerrillas’ most profitable arm is turning against them.

Humanitarian exchange (of all those kidnapped, not just the illustrious) can only come about if the guerrillas, in doing so, accept that never again will they resort to kidnapping anyone as part of the fight for their cause. These are the only terms on which negotiation can take place. Unless it takes place in this way, it would mean surrendering to an unacceptable exchange.

Note: This article was first published by JUST Response on November 15 2002. Héctor Abad Faciolince is a leading Colombian journalist, novelist and academic who resides in Medellín.

Also in JUST Response
Blair's Bobby Cooper for Colombian president?
Waiting for Godot in quarantine
Criminally courting Bush in Colombia

UP Return to top

Back to Page 1 Return to opening page