|

|
'Mr
Prodi has as much chance of being morally upright and free of
corruption as he has of being fully immersed in the nearby River
Po and stepping out bone dry.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
'Entrusting
Mr Prodi with the presidency of the European Commission is
tantamount to entrusting the running of a brewery to a chronic
alcoholic, the operation of a casino to an inveterate gambler or
the governorship of the Bank of England to the Sicilian mafia.'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Italy's
numismatic Mr Prodi - guru or godfather?
Domenico
Pacitti asks whether Romano Prodi was the right choice for European
Commission president given his controversial cultural background
POLITICS,
universities and the Roman Catholic Church are often held to be Italy's three
greatest scourges, respectively responsible for the promotion of a Machiavellian
mentality, insensitivity to truth and merit as values and the repression of an
independent social and moral conscience. Together they have helped maintain a
long-standing system, rooted in the Counter-Reformation and reaching back
perhaps even as far back as the late Roman Empire, in which corruption continues
to be not only socially acceptable but also virtually indispensable for
survival.
Like all Italian institutions, including the judiciary and the police force,
they are viewed by many as quite literally mafias, sharing identical ground
rules with the notorious and more dramatic Sicilian variety, the main difference
being that while the latter eliminates its victims physically, the former tends
to do so psychologically and spiritually. Common to both are the principle of
exchange of favours, gross over-concern with power and money, a cynical
disrespect of the law, strict observance of the code of silence and the complete
disregard of all social and moral criteria.
History shows that a peculiarly Italian corporative spirit has always
automatically transformed any collective undertaking into mafia, rendering it
impossible for even the most passive participants to avoid complicity in
corruption. The popular saying "In Italia tutto è mafia" (In Italy
everything is mafia) warns that any resistance to the system would be about as
futile as trying to stem the tide.
Viewed in this light, it is both ironical and perplexing that an Italian
professor-politician (over 40% of Italy's politicians are university lecturers)
with a permissive Christian Democratic background, should have been unanimously
approved on a "soul for Europe" ticket to take over from an outgoing
Commission accused of fraud, nepotism and mismanagement - activities in which
Italians have traditionally been past masters and of which Mr Prodi himself has
certainly had first-hand experience.
It was the Church which, through the customary channels of
"raccomandazione" (recommendation on the basis of criteria other than
merit), obtained for Mr Prodi his first major government appointment as industry
minister in the later 70s under the premiership and spiritual guidance of Giulio
Andreotti. Mr Andreotti, who has been Christian Democrat prime minister a record
seven times, is currently standing trial for his alleged involvement with the
Sicilian mafia in the 1979 murder of a journalist who made him the subject of a
damning article. That an elusive Mr Prodi may have managed to escape Mr
Andreotti's questionable influence is supported by the fact that a number of
letters addressed to Mr Prodi at his own ministry are reported to have been
returned "addressee unknown".
Mr Prodi began to make his presence felt in 1982 when the Christian Democrat
leader, Ciriaco De Mita, another former prime minister who later faced
allegations of corruption, placed him at the head of Italy's mammoth state
holding company, IRI (the Industrial Reconstruction Institute). When it was
decided that he had failed to fulfil his brief of reducing patronage,
inefficiency and waste, Mr Prodi was sacked but reinstated again for one year in
1993. During his premiership in 1996, a public prosecutor who accused him of
abuse of office and criminal offences in connection with exploiting the
privatisation of public companies for personal gain while chairman of IRI was
suddenly transferred without explanation.
The chief private company involved was an economic research centre,
appropriately named Nomisma (numismatics, or coin collecting), which Mr Prodi
founded in his home town of Bologna and ran together with some one hundred
shareholders. Mr Prodi's company, which the centre-right national daily
newspaper Il Giornale called "a sort of mafia cosca clan", secured
numerous contracts from the Emilia regional council in record time to produce
study reports on topics such as public holidays (£86,000), the state of
research and innovation (£70,000) and the economic impact of the Italian army (£48,000).
Although these and similar studies are said to have been either plagiarised or
simply thrown together, several were readily purchased by the Bologna provincial
council, which just happened to be chaired by Vittorio Prodi, Mr Prodi's
brother, who in turn commissioned a Church history of Bologna (£80,000) from
another of Mr Prodi's brothers, Paolo Prodi, a university professor.
Another of Nomisma's clients, the Tobacco Documentation and Information Centre,
had previously been created at the behest of the Philip Morris company, which
subsequently signed lucrative contracts with the Italian Finance Ministry for
the production and sales of cigarettes in Italy. Mr Prodi's wife too, Flavia
Franzoni, is reported to have performed remunerative part-time work providing
study reports for public institutions (£140,000). She is also said to have
benefited from a deal which privatised a former school for social assistants.
But Nomisma's biggest single killing was a piece of research on high speed
carried out for the national railways. Netting a cool £4 million and working
out at over £2 per word, it carried such gems as "The advantage of high
speed is speed", "Speed is greatly appreciated because it saves
time", "Preference for the train is inversely proportionate to
distance from the station: those who live closest to the station use the train
more readily" and "The market value of a flat whose view across a bay
is blocked by an eight-lane flyover inevitably falls".
A recently published book which courageously names names - always a perilous
practice in Italy - places Mr Prodi's Bologna mafia high among the country's
major power groups. Should a new law be approved, says its author, Bologna will
as European capital of culture for the year 2000 receive £33 million - £9
million in the first three years and £24 million over the next twenty years -
in order to encourage restoration work, which would leave the Prodi family
laughing all the way to the bank.
It is an open secret that Mr Prodi obtained his professorship at the University
of Bologna, again, through Church recommendations, thus forcing a potentially
more deserving candidate to wait up to ten years under the present system for
another opportunity, change career or attempt entry through the usual corrupt
means depending on his or her level of moral integrity. It is sadly indicative
though hardly surprising that in the course of his 25 years of teaching
economics and industrial policy at Bologna, Mr Prodi never once spoke out
against Italy's universities, one of the country's most criticised mafias,
sometimes said to merit the title of universities only by courtesy and arguably
the most grotesquely corrupt in the civilised world.
Pending the improbable event of his being brought to trial and convicted of
corruption, Mr Prodi seems likely to continue enjoying his foreign reputation as
Italy's honest politician, rendered more plausible by an ingratiating priestly
manner, an affable nature and an engaging down-to-earth human approach. But the
average Italian remains convinced that Mr Prodi has as much chance of being
morally upright and free of corruption as he has of being fully immersed in the
nearby River Po and stepping out bone dry.
Within this context Tony Blair's words, "I have always made it clear that
Romano Prodi has all the qualities to be an excellent president of the
Commission", seem decidedly over-generous and Mr Prodi's robust backing by
European Socialists for a full five-and-a-half year mandate perhaps
ill-considered. Just last month the Socialists argued that Mr Prodi's candidacy
for European elections was morally unacceptable - a fine point under the
circumstances.
Doubtless Mr Blair's judgement is at least partly based on Italy's successful
entry into the European Monetary Union under Mr Prodi's premiership last year.
But as Italy's greatest living historian and social observer Indro Montanelli
has pointed out, whatever the official records may have shown, there was no legitimate
way that Italy could have brought herself into line with the entry conditions in
such a short term. Only time will tell whether the Bank of Italy is the one
Italian institution miraculously exempt from a mafia mentality. The real miracle
was that Mr Prodi's 55th post-war government somehow managed to survive for as
long as 28 months. This, as it turned out, had little to do with Mr Prodi
himself and much to do with the widespread Italian fear that failure to enter
the EMU would have had disastrous consequences for Italy, a fear shared also by
the Communist Refoundation party and trade unions which lent Mr Prodi their
backing.
As Italy continues to look to Europe for political, economic and moral
salvation, Mr Prodi has had a dream, which he has set down in the form of a new
book published just last month, An Idea of Europe. "The search for a
European soul", he writes, "is beginning to appear as the dominant
problem for the future of our continent. It is certainly a sign of weakness to
think in terms of a possible future path for Europe's institutions (the
strengthening of Parliament, the resolution for the right of veto in exceptional
cases and the reorganisation of the European Commission and its powers) while no
one is able to dictate to us the path for the reconstruction of a European
soul." But in the course of a chapter entitled "A Soul for
Europe", which makes copious reference to the Roman Catholic Church, it
emerges fairly clearly that Mr Prodi himself intends to dictate such a path
while at the same time stressing the prior need for a "great moral
revolution".
One might be excused for hoping that in calling for a "specific mandate by
EU leaders for reform", Mr Blair intends to leave as little initiative as
possible for Mr Prodi's creative capabilities and that he also understands that
Italians can be made to work efficiently and even honestly provided they are
kept under close surveillance.
To many bemused Italians, stunned by Mr Prodi's windfall appointment but already
planning to cash in on it, entrusting Mr Prodi with the presidency of the
European Commission is tantamount to entrusting the running of a brewery to a
chronic alcoholic, the operation of a casino to an inveterate gambler or the
governorship of the Bank of England to the Sicilian mafia. Fortunately, Italy is
also an unpredictable country of exceptions, where the only thing that is
certain is that nothing is certain. Given the right conditions, Mr Prodi might
even succeed. Should he fail, he can always confess his sins.
NOTE:
This interview was published by JUST Response on August 15 2002. It first
appeared in Parliament Magazine (Brussels) on May 17 1999.
Return to top
Return to
opening page
|