|
|
Katrina KOs GOP fiscal policies Jason Leopold asks to what extent Hurricane Katrina brought about a man-made disaster due to Bush's policies
Republicans like to brag that, as a political party, they are more fiscally
responsible than their Democratic counterparts. Well, thanks to President Bush’s
four years in office that theory can now take up residence in the urban legend
department.
If anything, Bush’s tenure as president proves that the Republican tax cuts
(which everyone knows truly benefits the wealthiest one percent), drastically
slashing funds in the federal budget for much needed improvements to the
country’s aging infrastructure (a perfect example being the outdated power
grid), and trying to get away with launching wars on the cheap, have cost
taxpayers and their unborn grandchildren more money than anyone could have ever
imagined.
Simply put, since he became president, Bush has not invested the funds to fix
the cracks in the country’s façade, despite repeated warnings from experts and
intense lobbying efforts by state officials that ignoring the problem will make
it worse in the long run. Instead, the president pumped tens of billions of
dollars into an unnecessary war that, when it became evident that attaining
victory was tougher than the war planners imagined, required tens of billions of
dollars more just to continue the fighting.
Only when devastation and catastrophe struck the nation did the federal
government cough up the funds, but by then there wasn’t much of choice and as
such a $1 billion restoration project before a devastating hurricane touched
down in the Gulf Coast has turned into a $200 billion reconstruction effort and
has now saddled taxpayers with economic woes that no tax cut can relieve.
You don’t have to look too far than New Orleans, a city wiped out by Hurricane
Katrina, as evidence of the Bush administration’s and Congress’ fiscal
irresponsibility. It’s a direct result of
Flooding is the most destructive and costly natural disaster in the
Sadly, no one was becoming any smarter. Instead of funding flood control
projects, the Bush administration cut the Army Corps of Engineers budget,
forcing the city of
“It's not every day that
Al Naomi, a senior project manager for the corps told the Picayune that federal
funding has all but dried up threatening to put hurricane protection plans that
were already underway on hold indefinitely.
Naomi said the corps has been strained for money, as the federal government's
priorities have shifted to other concerns, such as homeland security, which
prior to Hurricane Katrina meant protection from terrorist threats, and the war
in
So, to hear the president in a televised speech promise to spend whatever it
takes to rebuild one of the nation’s great cities is not a sign of progress,
rather it’s a symbol of the total breakdown of his administration and an attempt
to conceal what could arguably have been a man-made disaster because of Bush’s
policies.
The final blow, however, came in June.
But the White House adamantly refused to part ways with the $5 billion it gets
from drilling in the Gulf Coast, its second biggest source of revenue (after
income the Internal Revenue Service brings in) choosing to use most of those
funds to finance the Iraq war.
To ensure that the message came across crystal clear, Bush personally ordered
White House aides to take the
unusual step of sending a letter to House and Senate negotiators advising them
to kill the revenue-sharing plan in the final version of the energy bill.
The White House’s Office of Management and Budget released a policy statement
paper in June that said the Bush administration opposes “the significant new
funding authorizations and diversion” of Outer Continental Shelf revenue
included in a national energy bill being discussed in Congress.
"Currently the federal government does share royalties with coastal states --
more than $3 trillion to date, in fact. Changing this amount only increases the
budget deficit and diminishes the benefit the rest of the nation receives from
these national resources," Scott Milburn, press secretary for the White House’s
Office of Management and Budget, told The Associated Press in June.
“Disheartening,” “frustrating,” “upsetting” and “just another nail in my coffin”
is how
Ironically the erosion to the state’s coastline—which became considerably worse
over the past five years—is due, in part, to oil and gas drilling in the Gulf,
much of which takes place right in
“While inland states enjoy 50 percent of the tax revenue from drilling on their
federal lands, Louisiana gets back a mere $35 million of the $5 billion it
contributes to the federal treasury each year from offshore drilling, or less
than one percent,” the Courier said.
In a written statement, U.S. Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-La., condemned the White
House position. Landrieu said the Bush administration simply can’t comprehend
why the state of
“The president’s statement indicates a failure to appreciate the burdens borne
by the people of
It wasn’t long after the White House issued its statement on the revenue sharing
concept that
Clifford Smith, a
"We’re not going to get the kind of recognition and concern we deserve until we have a disaster," he said. Note: This article was first published by JUST Response on September 22 2005. Jason Leopold is the author of the explosive memoir, News Junkie, to be released in the spring of 2006 by Process/Feral House Books. Visit Leopold's website at www.jasonleopold.com for updates.
|