Uruguay,
globalisation and coherence: an open letter to Claudio Martini
A
letter from Romeo Ramacciotti, Lucca
After
taking part in World Social Forum 3 at Porto Alegre last month, Claudio Martini,
the president of
the Tuscany Regional Council, visited Uruguay together with fifteen
business men from Tuscany. He was met by Uruguayan president Jorge Batlle and
representatives from local authorities and economic organisations.
These
meetings are reported in an article that appeared in [the Tuscan daily
newspaper] Il Tirreno on January 28 2003. It carries the title “Uruguay
needs help” and bears Martini’s own signature. In the article Martini blames
globalisation and lack of regulations for the collapse of agricultural product
prices and the consequent economic crisis in Uruguay.
In
the same article President Batlle is quoted as saying: “Martini, do you want
to know what our biggest problem is today? Well let me tell you. We are an
agricultural country and our standard produce is meat, milk, cheese and wool.
Until last year our meat producers were paid US$ 2,200 per ton whereas today
they receive only US$ 1,400”. Further on in the same article Batlle says:
“Our producers are paid 11 US cents a litre for milk, $1.4 a kilo for meat and
90 cents a kilo for wool. Despite this, our products are no longer competitive,
so much so that milk, cheese and butter products come to Latin America from
Europe, thus reducing our producers to hardship.”
In
another article, published by the Corriere della Sera on January 12 2003,
Gianni Riotta writes:
Articles
1 and 3 of the World Trade
Agreement, which established the WTO [World Trade Organisation] and includes
GATT Uruguay 1994 [General agreement on Tariffs and Trade], represent the heart
of the agreement insofar as they uphold the principle of non-discrimination, the
basis for all subsequent GATT and WTO agreements. This principle is stated in
two “rules”: a) the obligation to treat goods and services from any member
country in the same way, so that if special conditions are applied to goods from
one country then those same conditions must be applied to the same goods from
others; and b) the obligation for every nation to apply the same conditions to
goods imported from other countries as are applied to “similar” domestically
produced goods.
President
Martini, your article is devoid of coherence. You state that “Uruguay needs
help”. Let me remind you that Uruguay gained its independence after centuries
of colonisation by us Europeans. Those who underwent colonisation know what this
means and anyone who has doubts on the matter should get acquainted with the
facts.
Your
statement that “Uruguay needs help” is incorrect on two counts. Firstly, the
people of Uruguay were for centuries forcibly obliged to carry out the role of
suppliers of both their country’s natural resources and the fruits of their
own labour. So I do not see why we should set ourselves up as suppliers of help
to those whom we have so far plundered – unless, of course, it takes place on
an equal footing and together with our definitive renunciation of the role of
colonisers and full respect for the dignity of Uruguay.
Secondly, President Batlle has made no explicit request for help but has denounced a situation created by us Europeans, as is expressly stated in the Tirreno article. Given that Uruguay’s highest authority, President Jorge Batlle, has made no request for help, you, President Martini, must expressly provide the names of any persons who did make such a request and with what authority they did so. This would lend some coherence to the title of your article.
| Romeo
Ramacciotti |
| Researcher in hydromechanical engineering (private sector) |
| Lucca, Italy |
Note:
This letter, originally in Italian, was published by JUST Response on
February 25 2003.