|

|
|
- Domenico
Pacitti
Why
is the Human Rights Watch Academic Freedom Committee not watching Italy?
- Dear Domenico,
-
I
am a student of social sciences at the Università degli Studi di Messina in
Sicily. I do not give my full name to protect myself from retorsions but
hope you can answer my letter. Our Italian newspapers, but also foreign
newspapers, have reported that our university has been managed by the Mafia
for 25 years and we have many problems because of this. Your article [Firm
grip of corruption] about
our university was published when I was still at school but I discovered it
when I came to university in Messina where it is still circulated in Italian
translation. NevertheIess, I am sorry to tell you that your article didn’t
succeed in changing anything here. We took courage last year when JUST
Response appealed for international help and collaboration to put pressures
on Italian universities to change but still nothing is happening and we
heard no more about this appeal. Do you have more news about this and
who exactly were the people you asked for help?
- ––
Giuseppe D., Messina, Italy
-
- Dear Giuseppe,
-
I am sorry but hardly surprised to hear that the University of Messina is
still being run by Mafia, but that does not mean we should give up our
efforts to improve the situation. I remember that article well and have
never forgotten those people I met who showed great courage in speaking out.
More Italian students and academics should follow their example.
-
The appeal you mention [Appeal]
did not refer specifically to the University of
Messina. It referred to the well-known case of David Aliaga, a Canadian who
was denied his doctorate degree in circumstances which appeared to suggest a
sort of examiners’ vendetta against him for having had the audacity to
stand up for his rights. But the appeal went well beyond the Aliaga case in
that it spotlighted widespread endemic corruption within the Italian
university system, which obviously includes the University of Messina, and
which covers a multitude of sins. To take just one example, deep-rooted corruption
in the allocation of tenured university posts has been vehemently decried by
no less than the current head of the Italian Senate, Marcello Pera [Italy
plagued by Mafia-style universities]. We outlined these and other relevant facts
about Italian universities to the Human Rights Watch Academic Freedom
Committee and we asked their members to lend their support to a worthy cause
and, as you say, collaborate with us in helping to bring the necessary
pressure to bear on Italy.
-
On July 23 2003, we sent our letter to each of the following people at Human
Rights Watch together with an introductory note:
-
As far as I know, Mr Yeh is still
Academic Freedom Program Associate and official spokesman, while the others
are all co-chairs of the HRW Academic Freedom Committee. Over six weeks
later, having received no replies, we wrote to all of them again, politely
inviting them to respond. Well, let's say we are still awaiting their
replies.
-
Aliaga did eventually manage to get a statement from Mr Yeh, who apologised
“for not being able to assist [...] in this matter”. He mentioned time
and money limitations and concluded: “Unfortunately, the Italian
university system is not currently a research priority for Academic Freedom
work at Human Rights Watch.”
-
According to the Human Rights
Watch website, the Academic Freedom Committee’s membership has since at
least as far back as August 17 2000 included the following academics:
-
So
there you have an impressive list of people, some of whom totally ignored
requests for support and collaboration in combating Italian university
corruption, and some of whom chose to be members of a committee which
ignored such requests.
-
At this point
some interesting questions arise. Are we to assume that all of the above
academics endorse Mr Yeh’s position that “the Italian university system
is not currently a research priority for Academic Freedom work at Human
Rights Watch”? What, one wonders, would be required for it to become a
priority? Dropping an H-bomb on the University of Messina perhaps? Why is it
that universities in so-called advanced western democracies appear to fall
beyond the scope of the Committee’s investigations? Could there be a
strong bias here? If so, to what extent is it a conscious bias? Or to what
extent, like Orwell’s self-censorship, is it unconscious? Could it be that
such distinguished academics are actively condoning the perversion of higher
education in Italy because of a natural instinct to support colleagues who
are in the same trade? Or does their resolute inaction rather reflect an
embarrassed awareness of similar, though perhaps less spectacular,
irregularities at their own, more "respectable" universities? Who
decides what Human Rights Watch should be watching and what it shouldn’t
be watching? And who is watching Human Rights Watch?
-
It might well prove rewarding to take these questions seriously and
launch some in-depth investigations.
August 28 2004
Note: Your questions for Pacitti
should be sent to:- letters@justresponse.net.
|
Domenico Pacitti is Editor of JUST
Response. He
has written over 400 articles against corruption in Italy. He has taught
philosophy, linguistics and Chinese at universities in the UK and Italy
and currently teaches English language and American literature at the
University of Pisa |
|
 |
|
Return to top
Return to
opening page
|